Revision as of 16:05, 19 October 2017 (view source) GBR Stow (talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:06, 19 October 2017 (view source) GBR Stow (talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 370:		Line 370:
	| align=center style="border:0.75pt solid #000000;padding:0.132cm;color:#000000;" | X		| align=center style="border:0.75pt solid #000000;padding:0.132cm;color:#000000;" | X
	|-		|-
−	| style="border-top:0.75pt solid #000000;border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000;border-left:0.75pt solid #000000;border-right:none;padding:0.132cm;" | [[DataIdentification | DGITYP]]	+	| style="border-top:0.75pt solid #000000;border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000;border-left:0.75pt solid #000000;border-right:none;padding:0.132cm;" | [[Data_Identification | DGITYP]]
	| style="border-top:0.75pt solid #000000;border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000;border-left:0.75pt solid #000000;border-right:none;padding:0.132cm;color:#000000;" | Geospatial Information Type		| style="border-top:0.75pt solid #000000;border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000;border-left:0.75pt solid #000000;border-right:none;padding:0.132cm;color:#000000;" | Geospatial Information Type
	| align=center style="border-top:0.75pt solid #000000;border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000;border-left:0.75pt solid #000000;border-right:none;padding:0.132cm;color:#000000;" | 0..1		| align=center style="border-top:0.75pt solid #000000;border-bottom:0.75pt solid #000000;border-left:0.75pt solid #000000;border-right:none;padding:0.132cm;color:#000000;" | 0..1

---

Revision as of 16:06, 19 October 2017

DMF metadata elements

General

Viewpoints

The DGIWG Metadata Vision defines a general metadata use case involving metadata elements in four different contexts (i.e. use case scenarios):

• Discovery concerns the most important metadata elements, i.e. the metadata elements involved when a user needs to discover existing resources;
• Evaluation concerns the metadata elements needed to understand whether the discovered resources meet the user requirements;
• Use concerns the metadata elements needed to access and use the resource;
• Management concerns the metadata elements needed to manage the existing resources.

From a user viewpoint, the involved DMF metadata elements depend on these four contexts. Four viewpoints corresponding each to one of these four contexts are expressed here as sets of metadata elements applicable to the specific context.#

Metadata element sets

The DMF metadata elements document different aspects of the resources including their identification, the related quality information, the spatial representation and the content description of the resource data. Each aspect is dealt with by the definition of an identified element set grouping the metadata elements covering the documentation of the aspect.

This grouping mechanism is important for the users especially when the number of metadata elements to be considered becomes high.#

Metadata classes

*

• DMF/Common is an additional set of metadata elements for a more complete description of any type of resource supported by DMF. It extends DMF/Core and covers discovery and basic evaluation use cases.
• DMF/Services extends DMF/Core for service metadata and can be used together with DMF/Common (i.e. it is possible to use DMF/Services on top of DMF/Core (if DMF/Common elements are not needed) or on top of DMF/Common for an extensive profile).
• DMF/Data extends DMF/Common for data related resources (i.e. dataset, series and tile). DMF/Data adds metadata elements for evaluation and use.
• DMF/Data+ extends DMF/Data for the implementation of coverage quality results and other metadata elements introduced in ISO 19115-2 but having some applications for any geospatial product.
• A DMF/Sensor class extending DMF/Data for sensors.
• DMF/Defence extends DMF/Core or DMF/Common for military oriented needs including NATO needs (extensions defined in NGMP, particularly security). It is needed to handle metadata to be exchanged with NATO in conformance with NGMP. DMF/Defence can be implemented with DMF/Core and possibly any other metadata class.
• DMF/Specific is an extension of the ISO metadata standards for high level military implementation of the DMF metadata elements.

1. The documentation of a candidate Metadata Catalogue shall list the supported DMF metadata classes as defined in clause 5.1.3of this document.
2. A candidate Metadata Catalogue shall support at least the DMF/Core.
3. A candidate Metadata Catalogue having an output facility shall propose a mechanism to output a DMF Metadata Set conforming to one of the supported DMF metadata classes.
4. A candidate profile of the DMF shall define the profiled DMF metadata classes. It shall respect the rules for profiling a DMF metadata class defined in Annex A.
5. A candidate profile of the DMF can define one or more metadata class extending the DMF. It shall respect the rules for extending DMF defined in Annex A.

Metadata element requirements

Each DMF metadata element pertains to one metadata class. Each metadata element of the DMF has:*

• A Title serving as a human-oriented comprehensive identifier;
• An indication of the related metadata class;
• A Description statement which may include the expression of constraints (preceded by “Constraints:”) applicable to the metadata element;
• A Value Domain defining the applicable data types and vocabularies, as well as the applicable restrictions of the domain of values. Individual values are expressed in bold.
• A Cardinality statement.

Each basic type and vocabulary also pertains to one metadata class. Some data types are complex, i.e. they comprise of a set of properties also having an identifier, a title, a description, an indication of the related metadata class, a value domain and a cardinality. A complex data type implicitly pertains to the metadata classes defined for its properties (i.e. the complex type properties may relate to different metadata classes).

The cardinality statement may be expressed as:* a number of occurrences (typically 1 indicates that one and only one occurrence is expected), or;

• a range expressing a minimum and maximum number of occurrences. The format of a range of occurrences is n…m where:
• n is a positive integer or 0 indicating that the field is optional, i.e. it may not occur on any resource;
• m is a positive integer or * indicating that the maximum is unbounded.

The cardinality statement defines the minimum and maximum number of occurrences of the DMF metadata elements in terms of relevance for the types of resources supported by DMF. A metadata element is optional (i.e., its minimum occurrence is set to 0) when it may not occur when documenting any resource in the scope of DMF. Constraints are expressed when the relevance of the metadata elements is specific to some resource types or depends on the value of other metadata elements.#

1. Within a DMF Metadata Set describing a dataset, dataset series, service, tile, or nonGeographicDataset, each instance of a property or metadata element having a complex data type shall comprise the property instances applicable to the supported metadata classes according to the data type definition.
2. The content of each occurrence of a DMF Metadata Set shall conform to the value domain (including the data type definition) and description (including the identified constraints) of the metadata element.
3. A candidate Metadata Catalogue shall be able to manage each of the metadata elements, data types and complex data type properties pertaining to the supported metadata classes, whether it is optional or not.

The constraints applicable to DMF profiles with respect to the cardinality of the metadata elements are part of the rules for profiling defined in Annex A.

The following documentation of the DMF metadata elements is composed of:* The overview of the DMF metadata elements (see clause 5.2) which expresses the identifier, the title, the metadata class and the cardinality statement of the DMF Metadata Elements. It also organizes the metadata elements into four different viewpoints

• The detailed description of the DMF metadata elements organised by metadata element sets (see clause Error: Reference source not found).

Metadata Element Overview

For a detailed description of the metadata elements see clause 5.3.

Identifier	Title	Card	Metadata Class	Viewpoints
D	E	U	M
MDSID	Metadata Set Identifier	0..1	DMF/Core				X
MDLINK	Metadata Linkage	0..1	DMF/Specific				X
MDPTMD	Parent Metadata Set	0..1	DMF/Common				X
MDDLOC	Metadata Default Locale	1	DMF/Core		X	X	X
MDTLOC	Metadata Translation	0..*	DMF/Common			X	X
MDRPTY	Metadata Responsible Party	1..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
MDDATE	Metadata Date Stamp	1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
MDSTD	Metadata Standard	1	DMF/Core		X	X	X
MDSCST	Metadata Security Constraint	0..*	DMF/Common	X	X	X	X
MDREL	Metadata Releasability Addressee	0..*	DMF/Defence	X	X	X	X
MDLCST	Metadata Legal Constraint	0..*	DMF/Common		X	X	X
MDMFRQ	Metadata Maintenance Frequency	0..1	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSTITLE	Resource Title	1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSALT	Resource Alternate Title	0..1	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSABSTR	Resource Abstract	1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSPURP	Resource Purpose	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSTYPE	Resource Type Code	1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSTYPN	Resource Type Name	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSED	Resource Edition	0..1	DMF/Core		X	X	X
RSEDDAT	Resource Edition Date	0..1	DMF/Core		X	X	X
RSID	Resource Identifier	0..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSKWDS	Resource Keyword Set	0..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
THUMB	Resource Thumbnail	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
GPHICS	Resource Graphics	0..*	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSSRES	Resource Spatial Resolution	0..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSTRES	Resource Temporal Resolution	0..*	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSRPTP	Resource Spatial Representation Type	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSTOPIC	Resource Topic Category	0..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSDLOC	Resource Default Locale	1	DMF/Core		X	X	X
RSTLOC	Resource Other Locale	0..*	DMF/Core		X	X	X
DGITYP	Geospatial Information Type	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSGFLV	Resource Georeferencing Level	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSPREF	Resource Representation Form	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSDTLVL	Resource Data Level	0..1	DMF/Defence	X	X	X	X
RSTHEME	Resource Theme	0..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
[Data_Identification | RSSERI]]	Name of Resource Series	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSSHNA	Resource Sheet Name	0..1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSENVD	Resource Environment Description	0..1	DMF/Data			X	X
RSREM	Resource Remark	0..1	DMF/Common	X	X	X	X
RSFMT	Resource Format	0..1	DMF/Data		X	X	X
SRTYPE	Service Type	1	DMF/Services	X	X	X	X
SRTVER	Service Type Version	1	DMF/Services	X	X	X	X
SRSTD	Service Standard	0..1	DMF/Services		X	X	X
SRCPLING	Service Coupling Type	1	DMF/Services		X	X	X
SROPRS	Resource Operated by the Service	0..*	DMF/Services		X	X	X
SROPER	Service Operation	1..*	DMF/Services		X	X	X
SRCORS	Service Coupled Resource	0..*	DMF/Services			X	X
RCGRSPREP	Spatial Representation of a Georectified Gridded Coverage	0..1	DMF/Data			X	X
RFGRSPREP	Spatial Representation of a Georeferenceable Gridded Coverage	0..1	DMF/Sensor			X	X
GRCINF	Content Information of the Coverage	0..1	DMF/Data+			X	X
ASSOC	Image Association Type	0..1	DMF/Sensor		X	X	X
SPECTMOD	Spectral Mode	0..1	DMF/Sensor		X	X	X
VCTOLVL	Topology Level	0..1	DMF/Data			X	X
VGEOM	Geometric Object	0..*	DMF/Data			X	X
FCDESC	Feature Catalogue Description	0..1	DMF/Data			X	X
RSEXT	Resource Extent	0..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSRSYS	Resource Reference System	0..*	DMF/Core			X	X
RSSTAT	Resource Status	0..1	DMF/Common				X
RSDATE	Resource Reference Date	1..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSRPTY	Resource Responsible Party	0..*	DMF/Core		X	X	X
RSMTNC	Resource Maintenance	0..1	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSSCST	Resource Security Constraint	0..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSREL	Resource Releasability	0..*	DMF/Defence	X	X	X	X
RSUSE	Resource Use Limitation	0..*	DMF/Core		X	X	X
RSLCST	Resource Legal Constraint	0..*	DMF/Core		X	X	X
RSLING	Resource Lineage	1	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSRQR	Resource Regulated Quality Report	0..*	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSUQR	Resource Unspecified Quality Report	0..*	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSSRC	Source of the Resource	0..*	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSPRST	Resource Process Step	0..*	DMF/Common		X	X	X
RSSPUS	Resource Usage	0..*	DMF/Common			X	X
RSDFMT	Resource Distribution Format	1..*	DMF/Core	X	X	X	X
RSONLLC	Resource Online Location	0..*	DMF/Core		X	X	X
RSUD	Resource Unit of Distribution	0..1	DMF/Data			X	X
RSTS	Resource Transfer Size	0..1	DMF/Data			X	X
RSOFDM	Resource Offline Distribution Medium	0..*	DMF/Data			X	X
ACINS	Acquisition Instrument	1..*	DMF/Sensor	X	X	X	X
ACPLAT	Acquisition Platform Information	0..1	DMF/Sensor		X	X	X
ACMETCD	Meteorological Conditions of Acquisition	0..1	DMF/Sensor			X	X
ACDATE	Acquisition Date Time	0..1	DMF/Sensor	X	X	X	X
SUNAZ	Sun Azimuth	0..1	DMF/Sensor		X	X	X
SUNEL	Sun Elevation	0..1	DMF/Sensor		X	X	X