Difference between revisions of "Service Coupling"
From DGIWG
(Created page with "==== Service Coupling ==== <div style="color:#000000;">The properties of Service Coupling are listed below.</div> {| style="border-spacing:0;width:16.245cm;" |- ! style="bo...") |
|||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | |||
<div style="color:#000000;">The properties of Service Coupling are listed below.</div> | <div style="color:#000000;">The properties of Service Coupling are listed below.</div> | ||
− | {| style="border-spacing:0;width: | + | {| style="border-spacing:0;width:30cm;" |
|- | |- | ||
! style="border:1pt solid #000000;padding:0.049cm;" | Identifier | ! style="border:1pt solid #000000;padding:0.049cm;" | Identifier |
Latest revision as of 13:38, 7 May 2021
The properties of Service Coupling are listed below.
Identifier | Title / Description | Value Domain | Card |
---|---|---|---|
operationName
[DMF/Services]
|
Operation Name
Name of the operation.
|
String | 1 |
identifier
[DMF/Services]
|
Identifier
Identifier of the tightly coupled dataset.
|
String | 1 |
scope
[DMF/Services]
|
Scope
Scope of the coupling (e.g. name of the WMS layer in which the coupled data are provided when a GetMap operation is called).
Constraints: * Anchor complex type is not allowed for scope.code and scope.namespace which are necessarily implemented as String
|
Identifier | 0..1
|